← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19904/2014withdrawn

Kailash Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-17Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19904 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Kailash Prasad Singh son of Late Dwarika Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla- Rukunpura, Police Station- Rupaspur, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Patna

3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna

4. The Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna

5. The Town Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna

6. The Executive Officer, New Capital Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna

7. The Chief Engineer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna

8. The Shri Ganpati Laxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd., Rama Griham, Vijay Nagar, Road No. 3, Rukunpur, Police Station- Rupaspur, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Rajpati, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, GA-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 17-12-2015 Heard Mr. Pramod Rajpati, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Advocate General-9, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Heard also Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Patna Municipal Corporation.

After some argument, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.19904 of 2014 (2) dt.17-12-2015 2/2 petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U