Pinku @ Pappu Yadav @ Pintu Yadav @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56640 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2020 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== PINKU @ PAPPU YADAV @ PINTU YADAV @ PAPPU Son of Jehal @ Bindeshwar Yadav @ Jehal Yadav R/V- Sujatpur, P.S- Ghoshi, DistJehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, two unknown persons came with motorcycle and snatched the bag of the informant, in which his new laptop, purse, PNB ATM Card, Voter Id Card were kept

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56640 of 2022(5) dt.06-04-2023 2/3 and fled away.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. He submitted that petitioner is falsely implicated in this case due to dirty local politics. The petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor he has put on T.I. Parade. From perusal of the case diary vide para-75, it shows that the looted laptop was recovered in other case in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 240 of 2020 dated 10.07.2020. He submitted that he has been dragged in this case, on the basis of criminal antecedent of the petitioner. He further submitted that no person will be punished twice for the same offence. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.12.2020.

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Khizersarai P.S. Case No. 180 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56640 of 2022(5) dt.06-04-2023 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV, Gaya.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U