Ramesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56522 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2025 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== Ramesh Ray S/o Late Sabhapati Ray @ Sabha Ray R/o Village - Panchpatiya, P.S. - Avtar Nagar, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kunal Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Avtar Nagar P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that on 17.05.2025 at about 08:30 PM, when he had gone out to bring milk, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, armed variously came to his house and brutally assaulted his two sons and her wife in order to forcibly end the ongoing case. It is further alleged that they forcibly took away a briefcase kept in his room containing Rs. 2,50,000/- from his house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case with ulterior motive and with false allegations, in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56522 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 order to save their skin from assault they have caused upon Arvind Rai, who is agnate of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the F.I.R. was lodged with a delay of three days, and no satisfactory explanation has been provided for the same. There exists a case and counter-case between the parties involved. Upon perusal of the F.I.R., it is evident that there is prior litigation between the parties and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Avtar Nagar P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T