Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66389 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2021 Thana- VIDYAPATINAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Singh Son Of Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar Singh Resident Of Village - Nayatola Daniyalpur PS - Teghra District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2022 Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding. The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Vidyapati Nagar P.S. case No.86/2021 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case, in short, is that three unknown miscreants looted the motorcycle and mobile of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66389 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2022 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants are said to have looted the motorcycle and mobile of the informant. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the complaint case/F.I.R. It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in covid cases.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66389 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2022 3/3 Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 3, Dalsinghsarai, District Samastipur in connection with Vidyapati Nagar P.S. case No.86/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T