Guddu Ray @ Ravi Raushan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60995 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2022 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Guddu Ray @ Ravi Raushan, S/o Shankar Prasad Yadav @ Shankar Ray, R/o village - Brahmpur, police station - Bhagwan Bazar, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Abhishek, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case no. 310 of 2022 registered under sections 379, 147,148, 149, 427 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on the date of occurrence he heard sounds of the glass of the window of his house being broken. On looking out it transpired that there were hundreds of students who were
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60995 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 2/3 pelting stones in protest against the Agniveer Scheme. The informant states that there is availability of CCTV footage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation. Referring to the order of the learned trial Court it is submitted that the allegation, so far as this petitioner is concerned, is that he was the financier of the ransack. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that neither the petitioner participated in the occurrence nor was he the financier and the reason for his false implication is that he happens to be a supporter of the other political party.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation in the F.I.R. and the nature of material that has transpired in course of investigation which is evident from the order of the learned Court below, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case no. 310 of 2022 on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60995 of 2024(2) dt.19-09-2024 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran. (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T