Santosh Kumar @ Vikram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53361 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -188 Year- 2017 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Santosh Kumar @ Vikram Son of Ram Sharan Prasad Resident of village- Ahiyasa, P.S.- Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kako P.S. Case No.188 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 379, 411, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of stolen motorcycle from the possession of the petitioner. It has also come that he has purchased from other co-accused.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is only purchased and he has nothing to do with the fact that it is a stolen one. He is in custody for about 2 1⁄2 months, though he is accused in one more case but he is on bail. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53361 of 2017 (3) dt.16-11-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.K.Rajak, Sub Judge 4th, Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S.Case no.188 of 2017. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T