Ranjit Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7348 of 2013 =========================================================== Ranjit Kumar Pandey, son of Sri Mahendra Narayan Pandey, resident of Village Kalikapur, P.S. Madhepur, Dist. Madhubani at present residing at Road No.8/A, P.D. Mishra Road, P.S. Kankarbagh at and Dist. Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Bihar State Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary College, Patna- 800014.
4. The Chairman, Bihar State Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna-800014.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, AC to AAG-8 For the SSC : Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the Sate as also counsel for the Staff Selection Commission. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- "1A.
For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to declare the petitioner as successful candidate for the post of Enforcement Sub-Inspector under the Transport Department/Corporation of the Government of Bihar. B.
To quash the result dated 9.11.2012 published in daily news paper contained in Annexure-3.
C.
For directing the respondents to produce the answersheet of the petitioner in this Hon'ble Court. D.
For passing any other order/s, command/or or appropriate writ/s which your lordships deem fit and
Patna High Court CWJC No.7348 of 2013 dt.04-05-2016 proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case."
As this case is fully governed by the order passed in CWJC No. 141 of 2013 where the Court has discussed threadbare the issue involved with respect to the selection of the candidates as Sub Inspector, Transport Department, did not interfere and rejected the claim. It also appears that persons, aggrieved by the order passed by the learned single Judge, filed LPA being LPA No. 249 of 2014 in connection with CWJC No. 5135 of 2013 which was also rejected. In that view of the matter, there is no merit in the present application and the same is dismissed. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13-05-2016 Transmission Date