Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.60902 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -295 Year- 2017 Thana -LAHERI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Ajeet Kumar, S/o Ashok Prasad, Resident of Village-Jorarpur, P.S.- Deepnagar, District- Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner is in custody since 01.09.2017 in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No.295 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 386, 427, 506, 341, 323 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that one mobile was recovered and a person Ajit Singh, who was taken into custody in connection with the present case, has desired to speak to the petitioner with the said mobile phone. He further submits that save and except the said allegation, the petitioner has no connection with the present case. It is also submitted that he has not been put on T.I. Parade to substantiate the allegation of snatching of mobile.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60902 of 2017 (3) dt.18-01-2018 2/2 In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No.295 of 2017, subject to the following conditions
(1) One of the bailors will be his blood relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T