Bigan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3047 of 2017 (4) dt.12-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3047 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -245 Year- 2017 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Bigan Yadav S/o Late Somar Yadav, R/o Village- Kamat, P.S.- Sherghati, District- Gaya.
.... .... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Sections 14(A) (2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, against refusal of the prayer for regular bail by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S.Case No. 245 of 2017 registered under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 3(2)V of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.
According to FIR, the appellant is suspected to have committed murder to the parents of the informant. Though there is no eye witness of the occurrence. The appellant allegedly confessed before the informant that he had committed the murder for the reason that the money of the parents of the appellant was due with the father of the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3047 of 2017 (4) dt.12-12-2017 informant.
Considering the fact that there is no substantial material against the appellant, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sherghati P.S.Case No. 245 of 2017, subject to the condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed and the impugned order is set aside.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T