Shiv Shankar v. The State Of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Department, Bihar, Pa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.707 of 2018 Along with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14681 of 2016 ====================================================== Shiv Shankar son of Late Mohan Lal Mahto Resident of Village-Hathsarganj, Ward No. 1, P.S.Hajipur Town, District Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, Through Principal Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Department, Bihar, Patna namely Mr. Amir Subhani
2. The Additional Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department, Bihar Govt, Patna namely Mr. Daya Nidhan Pandey
3. Smt. Rachana Patil,The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Vaishali, Hajipur
4. Sri Saurav Narayan Yadav, the District Devlopment commissioner- cumAdditional District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur
5. Sri Abhiuday, The Block Development Officer, Desari Block, Vaishali
6. The Circle Officer, Desari Block, Vaishali
7. Sri Ravindra Kumar,The Conducting Officer -cum-sub-Divisional Officer, Mahnar, Vaishali
8. The Block Development Officer, Patepur Block, Vaishali
9. Sri Pankaj KumarThe Circle Officer, Patepur Block, Vaishali ... ... Opp. Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-11-2018 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the State has assisted the Court and submitted that materials have been brought on record in the show cause filed on 09.08.2018, after service of copy on 07.08.2018 on learned counsel for the petitioner and thereafter supplementary show cause has also been filed on 01.10.2018 after service of copy of the same on learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court MJC No.707 of 2018 dt.28-11-2018 2/2 on 28.09.2018 which show that the order of the Writ Court dated 31.10.2017 in C.W.J.C. No. 14681 of 2016 stands complied with.
3. In view of the fact that nobody is appearing to press the application and also there is no rejoinder to the show cause and supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the authorities, the Court finds that the order in the writ petition has been complied with.
4. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U