Pandav Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52370 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2017 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Pandav Yadav, S/o Prasadi Yadav, R/o village Dhanichak, P.S. Amarpur, District Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. KUMAR VIRENDRA NARAYAN ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 280 litres 600 Ml. of country-made liquor was recovered from the possession of co-accused Ajay Sah, who disclosed that one of the owners of aforesaid liquor was petitioner. Petitioner claims that he is in custody since 28.8.2017.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52370 of 2017(2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Banka, in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2017.

If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

That apart, in view of the antecedent of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Banka within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T