Patna High CourtMJC/363/2018dismissed

Naresh Nath v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-26Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.363 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17482 of 2008 ====================================================== Naresh Nath, Son of Late Jag Narayan Ram, Resident of Village- Bharsara, Police Station- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sudhir Kumar, Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Rabindra Kumar Roy, Secretary, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. Himanshu Kumar Roy, Director Agriculture, Bihar Patna.

5. Birendra Kumar Singh, under Secretary, Agriculture Depth, Bihar, Patna.

6. Prabhu Ram, Director (Administration), Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna.

7. The Bihar Public Service Commissioner through the Chairman, Bailey Road, Patna.

8. Alok Kumar Sinha, the Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

9. Amrendra Kr. Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Raghwanand, G.A.11 Mr. Rajan, AC to GA11 For the BPSC :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard both sides.

The petitioner has filed this petition for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for violation of the order dated 07.02.2017, passed in CWJC No.17482 of 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was dismissed from service and this Court vide aforesaid order set aside the order of dismissal but remitted the case to the disciplinary authority to proceed further afresh in

Patna High Court MJC No.363 of 2018(5) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 accordance with law.

The learned counsel for the State filed show-cause and submitted that the dismissal of the petitioner has already been withdrawn and the case is pending before the disciplinary authority.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I do not find that the order of this Court has been violated. Accordingly, this contempt petition is dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) S.KUMAR/- U