Rajendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60281 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Rajendra Rai Son of Late Suraj Rai R/V-Village- Muktapur, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subodh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 14.04.2024, when he had returned home after work, when all the named accused persons including the petitioner came and started assaulting the wife of his brother, accordingly, the informant rushed to save her when it is alleged that Rajendra Rai (petitioner) assaulted him by pagaria causing injury on head, thereafter the other accused persons also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60281 of 2024(2) dt.26-09-2024 2/3 assaulted as detailed in the F.I.R.

4. The learned counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that against the petitioner it is alleged that he assaulted the informant by pagaria but then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated.

5. Learned A.P.P. along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kalyanpur P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60281 of 2024(2) dt.26-09-2024 3/3 Case No.100/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T