Parshuram Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55684 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2025 Thana- MAIRWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Parshuram Sharma S/o Late Kailash Sharma Resident of Village- Suryapura, PS- Mairwa, Distt.- Siwan, Bihar 2.
Subhash Sharma S/o Late Kailash Sharma Resident of Village- Suryapura, PS- Mairwa, Distt.- Siwan, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shiv Sager Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 2 as he has already been arrested during pendency of the case.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This anticipatory bail application with regard to above named petitioner no. 2 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.
5. Petitioner no. 1 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1),
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55684 of 2025(3) dt.04-11-2025 2/3 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
6. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 11.04.2025, when all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, entered the house of informant and demanded the property papers of her husband and when he refused to do so, he was brutally assaulted and during treatment, he succumbed to the injuries.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As per F.I.R., specific accusation is against co-accused Laxmi Kumari and Subhash Sharma. F.I.R. does not attribute any role to this petitioner.
8. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
9. Considering backdrop of the case and nature of accusation, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner no. 1 in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55684 of 2025(3) dt.04-11-2025 3/3 Magistrate V, Siwan in connection with Mairwa P. S. Case No. 161 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T