Bahadur Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54789 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.54789 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2017 Thana -BADHAILA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Bahadur Singh S/o Late Tesh Lal Singh, resident of Village- Padaria, P.S.- Baghaila, District- Rohtas (Sasaram).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Baghaila P.S. Case No. 28 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 452, 379, 354(A), 427, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner and others is of assault to the petitioner and also of try to outrage the modesty of wife of informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been made and though there is allegation of assault, however, all the injuries are found to be simple in nature and allegation under Section 354 (A) is only ornamental in nature. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in custody since 26.08.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54789 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Rohtas, Sasaram, in connection with Baghaila P.S. Case No. 28 of 2017,subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T