Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54585/2017bail granted

Sudarshan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54585 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54585 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -169 Year- 2017 Thana -CHOUTARWA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Sudarshan Yadav, Son of Late Kishun Yadav, resident of Village- Semra Badgo, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case No. 169 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 50 litrs of raw spirit. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 26.09.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54585 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Excise, West Champaran, Bettiah, in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case No. 169 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T