Sanandan Kumar @ Sanandan Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55652 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2022 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Sanandan Kumar @ Sanandan Kumar Chaudhary Son Of Vedanand Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Indra Colony, P.S.- Bahadurpur, DistrictDarbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no recovery from the conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55652 of 2022(2) dt.18-11-2022 2/2 possession of the petitioner rather 34 liters of Nepali liquor is said to have recovered from the motorcycle of the petitioner. He further submits that allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused managed to ran away from the place of occurrence. He further submits that apprehended person disclosed the name of the petitioner. He submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
Considering the facts and circumstance of the case and the fact that petitioner is the owner of the said vehicle from which the said recovery is made, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 91/2022. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T