Dhuran Kumar @ Dhuran Yadav @ Mantu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54610 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- Tilak Rai Ka Hata District- Buxar ====================================================== Dhuran Kumar @ Dhuran Yadav @ Mantu Kumar S/o Bade Lal Singh @ Badak Singh @ Badelal Singh R/o village - Parmeshwarpur, Semri, P.S - Dawath, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Ravindra Kumar.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that Nitish and Jai Prakash were apprehended along with a vehicle and on search a hidden number plate was found which suggested that the vehicle was stolen.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54610 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/3 implicated based on confessional statement of apprehended accused in police custody, which does not have any evidentiary value and the petitioner is not the owner of the alleged seized vehicle.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Ravindra Kumar vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that it is a case instituted under Section 338 of the B.N.S.S. also read with other sections of the B.N.S.S. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not disclosed in the anticipatory bail application about his profession, which amply demonstrates that petitioner is involved in such type of occurrence. It is next submitted that investigation of the case is in its nascent stages and in the event if the privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, in that event, the petitioner may abscond, on which, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54610 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 3/3 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tilak Rai Ka Hata P.S. Case No.45/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

7. Further, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, namely, Bade Lal Singh @ Badak Singh @ Badelal Singh.

8. It is made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this court is not co-operating in the investigation in that event the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

9. It is further made clear that if charge sheet is submitted connecting the petitioner with the offence apart from confession, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall loose its effect.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T