Sunil Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14903 of 2024 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Paswan Son of Shri Shyam Paswan Resident of Village- Milky Tola, P. O. Andauli P.S.- Alinagar District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director Primary Education Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education Darbhanga, Division, DistrictDarbhanga. 5.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga, District-Darbhanga. 6.

The District Education Officer, Darbhanga, District-Darbhanga. 7.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Darbhanga, DistrictDarbhanga. 8.

The Block Development Officer, Alinagar, District-Darbhanga. 9.

The Block Education Officer, Alinagar, District-Darbhanga. 10.

The Headmaster, Government Basic School, Milky (Higher Secondary School Mohiuddin Parki) Block and P.S.-Alinagar, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subodh Kumar, AC to SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Having gone through the case in its entirety and heard learned counsel for the parties, it would be deem, fit, proper and in the interest of justice, to relegate the case of the petitioner before the concerned authority for just and proper decision.

3. Accordingly, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondent no.5 along with the

Patna High Court CWJC No.14903 of 2024(2) dt.30-09-2024 2/2 documents, which have been annexed in this writ application, in support of his claim, within a period of two weeks from today. Respondent No.5 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.

4. It is made clear that Respondent No.5 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U