Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54779/2017bail granted

Ramdaresh Paswan @ Ram Daresh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54779 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54779 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2017 Thana -BITHAN BAZAR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Ramdaresh Paswan @ Ram Daresh Paswan, S/o Late Bindeshwari Paswan, resident of Village- Pusaho, P.S. Bithan, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 142 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 18 litres of Mahua liquor and 259 kg of java Mahua and other articles of manufacturing of illicit liquor from near by grave yard.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case only on suspicion and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 20.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54779 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge - II, Samastipur, in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 142 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T