Rahul Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59910 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2020 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Rahul Yadav Son of Kailash Yadav @ Faishon @ Faishon Yadav R/O Vill.- Latra, P.S.- Gopalpur, Dist.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 386, 387, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case on account of his antecedent, when from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that though allegation of extortion is alleged, but during the course of investigation, nothing transpired that any extortion amount was given on account of alleged threat as alleged in the FIR. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 3-6-2024 and charges against him has been framed by an order dated 1-102024.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59910 of 2024(3) dt.22-11-2024 2/2 4.

The learned APP opposes the bail application and submits that if privilege of bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner may abscond, on which the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence. 5.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case no. 25 of 2020.

6.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Kailash Yadav @ Faishon @ Faishon Yadav. 7.

However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner, after his release on bail, is trying to delay the trial in any manner, in that event, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T