← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56220/2025bail granted

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56220 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1245 Year-2024 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Manish Kumar S/o Ganesh Paswan R/o Village- Pokhraira, Ward No. 09, P.S.- Samastipur Muffasil, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Asha Kumari W/o Manish Kumar At present residing at house of her father Parikshan Paswan, R/o Village- Nikaspur, P.S.- Ujiyarpur, DistrictSamastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhay Shanker Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of the opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 85 of the BNS.

3. Allegation against petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and demand for dowry.

4. While denying the allegations made in the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he happens to be husband of opposite party no. 2. At no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56220 of 2025(3) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 point of time, petitioner demanded any dowry or committed torture with opposite party no. 2 and is still ready to keep the opposite party no. 2 with full honour and dignity. Moreover, the case is triable by the learned Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let this petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1245 of 2024, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) AjayMishra/- U T