Patna High CourtCWJC/5377/2013dismissed

Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-20Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5377 of 2013 ====================================================== Raju Kumar S/O Sri Ram Ayodhya Prasad R/O Village And P.O.- Badlu Tola, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran At Chapra, Presently Working As Panchayat Teacher In Navsrijit Primary School, Kohbarwa, BlockChapra Sadar, District- Saran At Chapra .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Saran At Chapra District- Saran At Chapra

5. The District Education Officer, Saran At Chapra, District- Saran At Chapra

6. The District Program Officer (Establishment), Saran At Chapra, DistrictSaran At Chapra

7. The Block Development Officer, Chapra Sadar, District- Saran At Chapra

8. The Block Education Officer, Chapra Sadar, District- Saran At Chapra

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Badlu Tola, Block- Chapra Sadar, District- Saran At Chapra

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Badlu Tola, BlockChapra Sadar, District- Saran At Chapra

11. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP VII. For the Respondent no.9: Mr. Bashishtha Nr. Mishra and Mr. B.K. Mishra, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-01-2016 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the respondent no. 9, the present Mukhiya. The counsel for the petitioner submits that entire payment has been made to the petitioner and, as such, this writ application has been rendered infructuous. The counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.5377 of 2013 (4) dt.20-01-2016 2/2 petitioner does not dispute about the payment but he submits that he should be allowed to file a representation if any payment is still due.

Looking to the prayer of the petitioner, the petitioner, if so advised, may file a representation with regard to any dues outstanding before the proper authority and the proper authority will deal with the matter and dispose of the same. With this observation, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Dilip/- U