← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5000/2013disposed

Ravindra Thakur And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-07Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5000 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Ravindra Thakur S/O Late Rajeshwar Thakur Resident Of Village Saidpur, P.S. Sahapur Patori, District Samastipur.

2. Parmanand Singh S/O Jai Mangal Prasad Singh Resident Of Village Harail, P.S. Mohiuddin Nagar, District Samastipur.

3. Rvindra Prasad Rai 'Ravi' S/O Late Mahangu Rai Resident Of Village Andaur, P.S. Mohiuddin Nagar, District Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

5. The District Superintendent Of Education, Samastipur, Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, Sr.Advocate. Mr.Navjot Yeshu, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. N.H.Khan, S.C.18 Mrs.Babita Kumari, A.C. to S.C.18.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-04-2016 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the respondents.

In this case the petitioners are claiming the Matric Trained Scale as has been mentioned in paragraph 1 of the writ application and further submits that this case is squarely covered by Judgment of Brajesh Kumar and others Vrs.State of Bihar and others and Shivdani Prasad and others Vrs. The State of Bihar and others reported in 2015 (3) PLJR 779.

The authority will examine the case of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.5000 of 2013 (9) dt.07-04-2016 2/2 petitioners within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the respondent authority would find that the case of the petitioner is evenly covered by the aforesaid case and the benefit which has been extended to Brajesh Kumar and others of the aforesaid case will also be extended to the petitioner.

This Court is not expressing any opinion in this regard.

With this observation this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) AnilKrSinha/- U