Patna High CourtCWJC/2002/2016disposed

Jaddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-19Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2002 of 2016 =========================================================== Jaddu Singh, Son of Late Antu Singh, Resident of Village - Garura, Post - Sakri, Police Station Kudra, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary cum Director Rural Development, Government of Bihar.

2. The Chief Secretary Urban Development Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4. The Executive Officer Nagar Parishad, Sasaram.

5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. A.K.Chaudhary, AAG-13 For the Nagar Parishad : Mr. Vijay Shankar Saran Upadhaya, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-05-2016 Heard parties.

The petitioner claims to have retired on 31.03.2013 on the post of Peon from Sasaram Municipality, Sasaram, however, it is contended that certain admissible dues have not been paid which has been detailed in Annexure-2, i.e., the representation filed by the petitioner before the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Sasaram. No counter affidavit has been filed in this matter. Accordingly, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Sasaram to examine the claim of the petitioner and take a decision upon his

Patna High Court CWJC No.2002 of 2016 dt.19-05-2016 2/2 representation (Annexure-2) within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is made clear that if the certain dues are found admissible to the petitioner then such payments should be made within the aforesaid period after necessary calculation in accordance with law.

If the claim of the petitioner is not found tenable then a reasoned order would be required to be passed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Sasaram, which should be communicated to the petitioner immediately.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 20.06.2016 Transmission Date N.A.