Bholu Das @ Bhole Nath Tufani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54673 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Bholu Das @ Bhole Nath Tufani, Son of Anil Das @ Anil Kumar Resident of Village - Samrat Chowk, Thana toli, P.s.- K. Hat (Maranga), Dist.- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No.456 of 2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 461, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution story as stated in First Information Report is that three motorcycle and one mobile phone was stolen from the premises of the informant, Manish Ranjan, Prahlad Kumar and Sanjeev Kumar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has got no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that a mobile phone was recovered from one Sumit Kumar, who has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54673 of 2019(2) dt.29-08-2019 2/2 allegedly disclosed the name of the petitioner as one of the accomplices. Learned counsel further submits that no incriminating or stolen article has been recovered from the possession or the premises of the petitioner. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and the name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the arrested co-accused, as such, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of surrender by him, he shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Court below upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the condition as mentioned under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U T