← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55551/2025bail granted

Sajar Alam @ Sanjar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-10Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55551 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2024 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Sajar Alam @ Sanjar Son of Md. Sabir R/O Vill- Kushaha, P.S.- Kasba, District- Purnia, Bihar Pin-854330 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nishant Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 185/2024 dated 13.05.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants ridden on two motorcycles are alleged to have looted Rs. 1,36,450/-, Aadhar Card, PAN Card, driving license and educational certificates on the point of pistol.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55551 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 co-accused, Md Noman. The other co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 24.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1570/2025. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 05.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Purnea in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 185/2024, with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T