Patna High CourtCWJC/20204/2014allowed

Neelam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-27Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20204 of 2014 =========================================================== Neelam Kumari, D/o Sri Ramautar Yadav, W/O- Amrendra Kumar Amar, Resident of Village- Tharauhi, P.S.- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut Division, Darbhanga

4. The District Magistrate, Madhubani

5. The District Education Officer, Madhubani

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Madhubani

7. The Block Development Officer, Block- Ladania, District- Madhubani

8. The Block Education Officer, Block- Ladania, District- Madhubani

9. The Block Teachers Appointment Committee through its Member Secretary, Block- Ladania, District- Madhubani

10. The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority through its Secretary, Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. P. Sharan, AC to SC-25 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. The petitioner has approached the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Madhubani in Appeal No. 929/08/12.

From the order-sheet dated 30.10.2012 (Annexure-8) passed in Appeal No. 929/08/12, it appears that the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Madhubani has dismissed the appeal on non-appearance of the appellant (petitioner herein).

Patna High Court CWJC No.20204 of 2014 dt.27-09-2018 2/2 Since the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Madhubani has not decided the appeal on its own merit, order dated 30.10.2012 (Annexure-8) is quashed. Accordingly, the matter is remitted back to the dated 30.10.2012 (Annexure-8) to decide the appeal afresh after hearing all concerned, who are likely to be affected by the final outcome of the appeal. The writ application is allowed and disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 01.10.2018 Transmission Date