Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21074 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2012 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Suraj Kumar, Son of Shiv Prasad sah, Resident of Village-Sapahi, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Turkauliya P. S. Case No. 371/2012 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 447, 341, 323, 379 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Both parties are Pattidars. There is land dispute between the parties. From the written report, itself it appears that there is land dispute between the parties. General and omnibus allegation is levelled against this petitioner that he uprooted the crops of the informant and also snatched golden chain worth of Rs. 60,000/-. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21074 of 2018(3) dt.10-05-2018 2/2 petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Turkauliya P. S. Case No. 371/2012, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Motihari, Dist. East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T