← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1915/2022disposed

M/S. Pawansut Construction v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-25Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah,Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1915 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18745 of 2018 ====================================================== M/s. Pawansut Construction Proprietor, Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar Singh, Male, aged about 34 years, Son of Tribhuwan Narayan Singh, Resident of Chandrashekhar Nagar, Rauza, P.S.- Rauza, District- Gazipur U.P. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Pratyaya Amrit the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Visheshwraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

Sri Hanuman Prasad Choudhary, Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Visheshwraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

Sri Laxmi Narayan Singh, the Chief Engineer, (South Bihar) Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Shailendra Bharti, the Superintending Engineer, Bhojpur Road Circle, Road Construction Department, Ara.

5.

Sri Rajnikant Tiwari, The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Buxar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Ranjan, Advocate Mr.Jay Prakash Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ram Prakash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.K. Dubey, AC to AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 25-08-2023 1.

In compliance of the order of this Court dated 01.02.2022 passed in CWJC No. 18745 of 2018, the contemnors have already paid a sum of Rs.1,23,79,979/- to the petitioner after deducting the tax amount.

2.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned

Patna High Court MJC No. 1915 of 2022(4) dt.25-08-2023 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submits that in case of any subsisting grievance, the petitioner be granted liberty to agitate the same before the respondent authorities. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ( Shailendra Singh, J) S.Sb/- U