Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58128 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray, aged about-25 years, male, S/O Mahendra Ray R/O Village- Bhagwanpur Ratti (Shahjahanpur), P.S.- Vaishali, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Sudha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the allegation in the FIR, when the informant and his wife went to attend a marriage ceremony then on their way, petitioner along with other co-accused person came and looted a bag from the informant including total Rs.45,000/- cash along with gold chain and mangalsutra.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that investigation has already concluded and accordingly charge-sheet has been submitted and no TIP has been conducted by the Investigating Officer during the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58128 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 investigation. He further submits that FIR is against the unknown persons and during the course of investigation, on the basis of the information given by the spy, the petitioner got arrested in this case. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2025 and has got five criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for Regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No.267 of 2025 with a condition that petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned Trial Court till conclusion of the trial. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T