Sanjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67664 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2021 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

SANJAY SINGH Son of Binod Chaudhary @ Binod Singh Choudhary @ Binod Singh Resident of Village - Ubadhi, P.S.- Karagahar (O.P. - Badahari), District - Rohtas (Sasaram) 2.

Ajay Singh Son of Binod Chaudhary @ Binod Singh Choudhary @ Binod Singh Resident of Village - Ubadhi, P.S.- Karagahar (O.P. - Badahari), District - Rohtas (Sasaram) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-09-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioners and other accused person assaulted the informant and his brother with bamboo sticks due

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67664 of 2021(4) dt.05-09-2022 2/3 to which they sustained injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and countercase between the parties. In the alleged occurrence both sides have sustained grievous injuries. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent, which is also mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is a case and counter-case between the parties and both sides sustained grievous injuries, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in Karagahar (O.P.-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67664 of 2021(4) dt.05-09-2022 3/3 Badahari) P.S. Case No.185 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T