Om Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62201 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2017 Thana -KOTWALI District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Om Prakash Yadav S/o Kapildev Yadav, R/o Mohalla- Chandi Asthan, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 29 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.
Allegation is of recovery of six Kg. of ganja. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from the other co-accused persons of this case, who confessed that they have purchased the said ganja from the petitioner; however, there is nothing to prove the said statement. Further he has been in custody since 22.08.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62201 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Munger, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 29 of 2017,subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T