← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53977/2019dismissed

Vikash Kumar Puri @ Raja Babu @ Vikash Puri v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-20Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 53977 of 2019 Arising Out of PS Case No.-72 Year-2019 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Puri @ Raja Babu @ Vikash Puri, aged about 25 years (M) Son of Mahendra Puri Resident of Village - Kanihar Ward no. 5, PS- Sugauli, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rashmi Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Sugauli PS Case No. 72 of 2019 dated 23.02.2019 instituted under Sections 363 and 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioner along with two others is accused of abducting the daughter of the informant at 11:00 o' clock on 11.02.2019, when she had gone out of the house to answer the call of nature.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that only the petitioner has been identified by the informant and once the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53977 of 2019 dt.20-11-2019 2/2 identity was known then there is no explanation as to why the FIR has been lodged on 23.02.2019. It was further submitted that the police from confidential sources have been informed that the daughter of the informant has gone away herself with some person and further that the parties have now also compromised.

5. Learned APP, from the case diary submitted that the girl is still traceless and that the witnesses have supported the prosecution story.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to allow the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T