← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19699/2021dismissed

Kavita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-19Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19699 of 2021 ====================================================== Kavita Devi, Wife of Ashok Kumar Mandal, resident at Village-Pitha Dobhi, P.O.-Sonupur, P.S.-Rosera, District-Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Patna, Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

3.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Rosera, Samastipur. 4.

The Circle Officer, Rosera, Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ghanshyam Choudhary, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy (GP-18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 The instant writ application has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking the following relief(s):

" I) For issuance of appropriate writ to quash the order dated 10.02.2021 as same Gypank no. 372 (Annexure-1) which is illegal / arbitrarily manner passed settlement of pond situated at village- Pitha Dobhi bearing Thana no. 50, Khata no. 225 Keshra no. 375, Rakwa- 1.25 acre P.SRosera, District-Samastipur. (II) For stay the aforesaid order proceeding, which has been passed by respondent authority malafide and arbitrary.

(III) For further direction be issued to the respondents be return the petitioner expense with 10% interest, who has expenses on fisheries business with consent respondent authorities as per scheme of the Government of Bihar. (IV) For any other relief or reliefs as your lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.19699 of 2021(4) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 case."

2. Mr. Ghanshyam Choudhary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, learned counsel appearing for the State-respondents are present and they are heard.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ application with a prayer to quash the order dated 10.02.2021 on the ground that it is illegal and has been passed in an arbitrary manner with regard to the settlement of a pond situated at village- Pitha Dobhi, bearing Thana No. 50, Khata No. 225 Keshra No. 375, Rakwa- 1.25 Acre, P. S.- Rosera, District- Samastipur. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to satisfy this court regarding any illegality in Gyapank No. 372, order dated 10.02.2021 passed by the Anchal Adhikari (Circle Officer), Rosera, which is under challenge in this writ application and further, it simply relates to a notice concerning the bidding process, so, considering this aspect as well as taking into account the averments made in the counter affidavit filed by the State-respondents, this court finds no merit in this application, so, it stands dismissed. (Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U