← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68469/2021bail granted

Santosh Bind v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68469 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2019 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== SANTOSH BIND Son of Jodhi Bind @ Ayodhya Bind Resident of Village - Ganga Bigha, P.S.- Karai Parsurai, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Geeta Devi Wife of Santosh Bind D/o Binod Bind, Resident of Village - Bahari Begampur, P.S.- Bypass, District - Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 406, 341, 323 and 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The accusation is of making assault for nonfulfillment of dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner tried his best to resume the conjugal life with the complainant but the complainant herself does not want to live with the petitioner. The petitioner is still ready to keep the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68469 of 2021(3) dt.02-08-2022 2/3 complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. A statement to that effect has been made in para 11 of the petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant has submitted that petitioner is in habit of making assault with the complainant. Hence, out of fear of life, she does not want to live with the petitioner.

In the alternative, the petitioner is ready to make payment of Rs. 5,000/- per month to the complainant by depositing the same in her bank account by 1st week of every month.

The petitioner undertakes that he shall pay the monthly payment of Rs. 5,000/- of this month i.e. August, 2022 to the complainant before filing of the bail bonds and from September, 2022, he shall continue making payment of Rs. 5,000/- per month by 1st week of every month in the bank account of the complainant.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant has accepted the offer of the petitioner and undertakes to provide bank account details of the complainant to the petitioner as early as possible.

Considering the aforestated facts, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68469 of 2021(3) dt.02-08-2022 3/3 court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Complaint Case No. 319C of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted by the learned court below on showing receipt of deposit of Rs. 5,000/- by the petitioner in the account of the complainant. The aforesaid payments will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T