Patna High CourtMJC/4769/2014disposed

Manik Chand Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-05-20Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4769 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2944 of 2007 =========================================================== Manik Chand Das, S/O late Mahanth Lal Das, R/O Village Saidabad, P.S.- Kako (Pali), Dist- Jehanabad (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar,

2. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad. Sri Aditya Kumar Das

3. The Additional District Magistrate, Establishment, Jehanabad. Sri Ravibhushan Kumar

4. The Block Development Officer, Karpi, Jehanabad Sri Akilesh Kumar

5. The Block Development Officer, Arwal, Gaya. Sri Devpusp Vishkarma

6. The District Magistrate, Arwal. Sri Jungbahadur Singh

7. The Treasury Officer, Arwal Sri Nand Kishor Singh .... .... Opp. Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opp. Party/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-05-2015 In the light of my order dated 06.05.2015 Circle Officer, Arwal has produced acquaintance roll wherefrom it appears that arrears of salary in the light of the instruction of the Government contained in Memo No. 287 dated 27.02.1988 was received by the petitioner on 18.04.1988, in the circumstances, there is no doubt that petitioner made false statement before this Court on 06.05.2015. Having found the petitioner to have spoken falsehood before this Court, I have no option but to relegate him to jail custody. When such order was passed petitioner submitted unconditional

Patna High Court MJC No.4769 of 2014 dt.20-05-2015 2/2 apology as also offered to deposit cost of Rs. 500/- in the office of Patna High Court Legal Services Committee by tomorrow. In view of the undertaking given by the petitioner to deposit cost of Rs.500/- the contempt petition is disposed of without remanding the petitioner to jail custody for the falsehood spoken before this Court.

(V.N. Sinha, J.) Rajesh/- U