Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court MJC No.4564 of 2014 (17) dt.22-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4564 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6921 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Jitendra Kumar S/O Sri Surendra Prasad R/O Village - Kichni, Police Station - Harnaut, District - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, Nalanda, Bihar
2. Shree Kartikey Dhanji Budhdhbhati, Son of presently not known to the Petitioner, Presently Posted as the District Magistrate - Cum - Chairman District Health Committee, Nalanda Bihar Sharif, Bihar.
3. Azad Hind Prasad , son of presently not known to the Petitioner Presently Posted as the Civil Surgeon - Cum - Secretary District Health Committee, Nalanda Bihar Sharif, Bihar.
4. Dr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Son of presently not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the In - Charge Medical Officer Primary Health Centre, Harnaut, Nalanda.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Bihari Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner seeks compliance of the order dated 17.07.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6921 of 2013. Having considered the various show-causes filed, it appears that the State has paid the dues of the petitioner after considering the arrangement which was made by him. Learned counsel, however, seriously resists the contention of the opposite party as stated in the show-cause. Be that as it may, it appears that there is some serious
Patna High Court MJC No.4564 of 2014 (17) dt.22-02-2018 dispute with regard to the engagement of the petitioner itself. Under such circumstances, no case under the Contempt of Courts Act is made out.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is given liberty to contest his claims, if at all, tenable under law. The contempt application stands disposed of.
(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U