Jang Bahadur Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court MJC No.1851 of 2013 dt.09-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1851 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 166 of 2005 =========================================================== JANG BAHADUR SINGH, S/O LATE BANSRAJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SUKHARI TOLA, P.S- SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS, AT PRESENT HEAD MASTER, PRIMARY CUM MIDDLE SANSKRIT SCHOOL SUKHARI TOLA KARMA, P.S- SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. .... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
SHRI LAXMAN KUMAR SINGH, THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT BIHAR, PATNA.
3. DR. RAMDEO PRASAD, CHAIRMAN, BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, PATNA.
4. SHRI THAKUR MANORANJAN PRASAD, SECRETARY, BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, PATNA.
.... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-03-2015 Heard Mr. S.S. Sundaram, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 3 and 4 and learned counsel for the petitioner. The present contempt application has been filed for noncompliance of the order dated 28.03.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3729 of 2001 and other analogous cases along with C.W.J.C. No. 166 of 2005 of the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party nos. 3 and 4 submits that in compliance of the order under contempt,
Patna High Court MJC No.1851 of 2013 dt.09-03-2015 the Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna (opposite party no.3) considered the representation of the petitioner by admitting his claim for holding the post of Head Master with a direction to the District Education Officer, Rohtas for payment of arrears on grant of allotment received by the State Government. Since the order, under contempt, has been complied with by the opposite party no.3, therefore, no further action is required. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of. If the petitioner feels any grievance, he may take recourse in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U