Arjun Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67224 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-517 Year-2021 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== 1.

ARJUN MAHTO Son of Babulal Mahto Resident of Village- Nawada Rajokhar, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. 2.

Anil Mahto Son of Babulal Mahto Resident of Village- Nawada Rajokhar, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

3.

Babulal Mahto Son of Late Gauri Mahto Resident of Village- Nawada Rajokhar, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. 4.

Parbatia Devi @ Parvati Devi Wife of Babulal Mahto Resident of VillageNawada Rajokhar, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 366A/ 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons abducted the daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67224 of 2021(2) dt.31-03-2022 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. On recovery, the statement of the victim has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that she left the house out of her own will. She has not supported the allegation levelled in the F.I.R. The petitioner no. 4 is a lady.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 517 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T