Brij Kishore Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14198 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2013 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Brij Kishore Sharma, S/o Raghunath Sharma, resident of Village- Harpur Kothi, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SMT. NIRMALA KUMARI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected twice vide order dated 26.02.2016 and 26.10.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 56431 of 2015 and 45362 of 2016 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2015, the trial has not been concluded as yet, other co-accused Raghunath Sharma and Kaushalya Devi have already been allowed bail, vide order dated 12.07.2017 on the letter of the learned trial judge further four months time was granted to conclude the sessions trial but the same has not been concluded as yet.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14198 of 2018(2) dt.21-03-2018 2/2 the petitioner is the assailant who has given Farsa blow on the head of Ram Rajya Sharma who succumbed to the injury. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of the prayer of bail of the petitioner, again his such prayer stands rejected in Sessions Trial No. 81 of 2014 pending in the court of learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra.

However, learned trial court is again directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T