Priya Ranjan Jha @ Yubraj Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54301 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Priya Ranjan Jha @ Yubraj Jha S/o- Jeevkant Jha @ Jibachha Jha, resident of Village- Adharsh Nagar, P.S.- Dhurba, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Sufiyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 51 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47A of the Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 252 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and he has not been named in the F.I.R an nothing has been recovered from him. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 26.09.2017 and other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.10.2016 and order dated 17.10.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40456 of 2016 and 41895 of 2016, respectively.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54301 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Jamui, in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 51 of 2016.

(i) Both the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relatives.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T