← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61180/2025bail granted

Bablu Bind v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61180 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- Vasudevpur District- Munger ====================================================== Bablu Bind S/O Late Rajo Bind Resident of Village- 2 no. Gumti, Beldar Toli, P.S- Basudeopur, Dstt.- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Basudeopur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 326(g)/3(5) of B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons is that they exploded bomb on the godown of the informant causing fire, the informant suffered loss due to damage caused by fire to the tune of Rs.10 to 15 lakhs.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has been made accused in this case due to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61180 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 his long criminal antecedent. The prosecution case is not believable that in midnight, the informant saw the petitioner and other co-accused persons moving around his godown. There is no eye witness to the occurrence and no one has seen the petitioner moving around the godown of the informant. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from the person or possession of the petitioner. Intentionally the petitioner has been made accused in this case because 17 days earlier, the son of the informant tried to outrage the modesty of the sister of the petitioner and the petitioner got injured in the said case, for which the sister of the petitioner has lodged Basudeopur P.S. Case No.

35 of 2025, dated 10.04.2025 for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2)(3), 74 and 3(5) of B.N.S. The petitioner has got criminal antecedent of 13 cases and he is on bail in all the cases. The petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that the specific allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons is that they exploded bomb on the godown of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61180 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger/concerned Court in connection with Basudeopur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below. (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T