← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57079/2022allowed

Panchu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-04Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57079 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2021 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== PANCHU SAH Son of Mangal Sah R/o village - Sisahani, P.S.- Pakari Dayal, District - Motihari (East Champaran) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through the virtual Court proceedings. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. Allegation is of recovery of 993.60 litres of liquor from a Bolero Pick Up Van.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57079 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 2/2 that petitioner came to be implicated because he is owner of the alleged vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent man would use his own vehicle for carrying an illegal activity and thus create evidence against himself. It is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that the vehicle would be misused by the driver.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 151 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T