← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65529/2024disposed

Anrud Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65529 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2024 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Anrud Ram S/o- Late Utim Lal Ram Village- Gharmohna, P.S. Lalmania O.P., District-Madhubani 2.

Pawan Devi wife of Anrud Ram Village- Gharmohna, P.S. Lalmania O.P., District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 506, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, petitioner No. 1 is alleged to have assaulted on the left hand of informant by means of iron rod as a result of which his hand got fractured. Petitioner No. 2 is alleged to have taken away box and other jewellery from the house of informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that due to land dispute between the parties an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65529 of 2024(4) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 altercation took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application and submits that injury caused to the informant by petitioner No. 1 is found to be grievous in nature.

6. In view of the fact that petitioner No. 1 caused grievous injury, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 1 is refused. However, considering the nature of accusation against petitioner No. 2, the anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner No. 2 is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner No. 2 in the event of her arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukaha (Lalmania) P. S. Case No. 31 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T