Kaushal Kishore Bharti @ Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64167 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2023 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Kaushal Kishore Bharti @ Ranjit Yadav S/o- Ram Prasad Yadav VillageBairiyahi, P.S. Narhaiya O.P., District-Madhubani 2.
Sanjay Yadav son of Ram Prasad Yadav Village- Bairiyahi, P.S. Narhaiya O.P., District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Bharti For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to passage, the accused persons including the petitioners on 10.06.2023 came to the house of her cousin brother and on orders of Kaushal, accused Vivek tried to strangulate her cousin by rope, further when family members came, the accused acted inappropriately with the female members and also assaulted her brother and also snatched chain of her Mami.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64167 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to passage. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laukahi (Narhaiya O.P.) P.S. Case No. 166 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T