Dr Vijay Kumar Prasad v. Sri Vyas Jee, Ias, The Chief Secretary And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 80 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13082 of 2012 ====================================================== Dr Vijay Kumar Prasad S/o Sri Ram Ekbal Prasad, R/o Village - Manjhagarh Langtuhata, P.O. - Garh Manjha, P.S. - Manjhigarh, District - Gopalganj (Bihar) Presently working and posted as Ayush Ayurvedic Doctor under Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Society, Madhubani (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Sri Vyas Jee, IAS, the Chief Secretary, Health -cum-Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Sanjay Kuamr, IAS, the Secretary, Health-cum-Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Lokesh Kumar Singh, the District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District Health Society, Madhubani (Bihar).

4. Sri Sudhir Kumar Sinha, the Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Society, Madhubani (Bihar).

5. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. M.P.Dixit For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. K. K. Sinha AC to GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5.

23-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate - 2 as well as Sri Kishore Kumar Sinha, learned counsel, who has appeared on behalf of opp. party no. 2. The present petition was filed with a prayer to initiate contempt proceeding on an allegation of disobedience to an order dated 31-07-2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13082 of 2012. By the said order, the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to examine the representation of the petitioner and pass speaking order within two months.

Patna High Court MJC No.80 of 2013 (5) dt.23-01-2015 2/2 The petitioner had claimed his posting at a place where his wife was posted.

In this case, a show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and alongwith show cause, an order has been brought on record, contained in Memo No. 4721 dated 08-06-2013.

Learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 submits that ofcourse some delay has occurred, but order of the writ court has already been complied with and reasoned order has been passed. In view of the fact that reasoned order, in compliance with the order of the writ court, has already been passed, there is no need to pass any positive order in the matter. The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U