Jitendra Narayan Shardul v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15403 of 2022 ====================================================== Jitendra Narayan Shardul S/o Yamuna Paswan R/o Village- Mahisouri, P.S. and District- Jamui, at present working as Nagar Teacher at Upgraded Middle School, Kalyanpur, Block and District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India x 2.

The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India, New Delhi.

3.

The Additional Secretary, Secretariat of the Election Commission of India, New Delhi.

4.

The Chief Election Commissioner Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Joint Secretary-Cum-Joint Chief Election Officer, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

9.

The District Election Officer-Cum-District Magistrate, Jamui, DistrictJamui. 10.

The Election Registration Officer-Cum-Deputy Development Commissioner, Jamui, District- Jamui.

11.

The Election Registration Officer-Cum-Subdivisional Officer, Jamui, District- Jamui.

12.

The Election Registration Officer-Cum-Additional Collector, Jamui, District- Jamui.

13.

The Election Registration Officer-Cum- Land Reform Deputy Collector, Jamui, District- Jamui.

14.

The Assistant Election Registration Officer-Cum-Block Development Officer, Jamui, District- Jamui.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Additional Solicitor General For the ECI :

Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2025 Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.15403 of 2022(4) dt.10-04-2025 2/2 petitioner, submits that the reliefs sought for by the petitioner in the instant writ petition have been granted by the respondent authorities.

2. In view of the submissions made above, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(Nani Tagia, J) Nishant/- U