Siddharth Rai @ Sidharth Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59426 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2023 Thana- BHAIRAVSHTHAN District- Madhubani ====================================================== Siddharth Rai @ Sidharth Ray Son of Shital Dev Rai @ Sheetal Dev Ray @ Shital Dev Ray Resident of Village- Muralikha, P.S.- Rajnagar, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bhairabsthan P.S. Case No. 89 of 2023, giving rise to G.R. No. 1266 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, when the informant along with his cousin was on his way, he was accosted by four unknown miscreants, who on the point of pistol snatched their mobile phones and motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59426 of 2024(2) dt.23-08-2024 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Amit Mandal and the same has got no evidentiary value. No T.I. parade has been conducted in this case and no recovery of looted articles have been made from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 03.07.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 52854 of 2024.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59426 of 2024(2) dt.23-08-2024 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Bhairabsthan P.S. Case No. 89 of 2023, giving rise to G.R. No. 1266 of 2023. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T