Raju Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21082 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2017 Thana -CHARPOKHARI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Raju Paswan, S/o Ram Krit Paswan, Resident of Village- Chakiya, P.S. Sikarhatta, District- Bhojpur at Arrah .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandan Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody on his remand since 16.11.2017 in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No.84 of 2017 registered for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner was taken into custody in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No.173 of 2017 on suspicion and thereafter he has been remanded in connection with the present case on the basis of the confessional statement made before the police by another co-accused, which has no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that there is no recovery from the petitioner and he has not been placed on T.I. Parade.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21082 of 2018 (4) dt.08-05-2018 2/2 the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Bhojpur (Arrah), in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No.84 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4)The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T